NVIDIA GEFORCE 9600 GSO 768MB DRIVER

I’m quite surprised there hasn’t been anymore development into this option, i would have thought that by now someone would have made a program to force the CUDA cores to take on PhysX. As you are finding out, likely not worth the effort. Hi, 1- I think you need a main nvidia gpu if you want to have physx 2- It is not recommended to use lower than a geforce to have a descent physx gpu boost or your performance will be worse then without a dedicated physx card 3- Unless you have a high end computer is is just eye candy and you will lose FPS If I where you, I would get the idea out of my head! I also suspect you haven’t taken a long look at Crossfire, if that’s what you’re contemplating. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Uploader: Dougrel
Date Added: 13 March 2007
File Size: 66.27 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 43170
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Only for nVidia have geforcce read things like lawsuits against nVidia for purposely over heating products to force upgrades, or cards dying from new driver updates, or driver updates that render the PC unusable, so on and so forth, i HAVE NOT heard, read, seen, or even experienced any of these problems. Run the hack and your done.

NVIDIA GeForce GSO

geforcee In terms of maintaining an unbiased opinion, yes, nVidia has gold with their PhysX, however, their products are over priced and their lack of friendly competition may end up be their ultimate undoing. Only a few dozen games use it, and with Nvidia in a scramble to make new cards to compete with AMD’s power gdo, its no wonder the major console contenders went for AMD products.

I also suspect you haven’t taken a long look at Crossfire, if that’s what you’re contemplating. As you are finding out, likely not worth the effort. Install nvidia drivers and physx drivers then the amd drivers dont forget the restarts if you dont restart after each it will screw up.

Related Drivers  SIS 650 651 M650 740 DRIVER DOWNLOAD

My GT is gpu 3. It has not worked for any drivers tso have been released over the past two years. More for far less, that is the trending economic option is it not? Kamikazi Apr 29, If you cant get it working with the info in that link you are doing something wrong.

gfeorce

Kamikazi Apr 24,8: Plz let me knw!!!! If your not sure if your nvvidia card is being used or cpu you can install msi afterburner and turn the on screen display so you can see if its being used or not but in most cases its clear as day. Kamikazi Aug gefirce,3: Subscribe to our newsletter. LB23 Apr 24,8: AMD is my hands down unbiased opinion, overall with price to performance ratio. Is PhysX worth it? Hi, 1- I think you need a main nvidia gpu if you want to have physx 2- It is not recommended to use lower than a geforce to have a descent physx gpu boost or your performance will be worse then without a dedicated physx card 3- Unless you have a high end computer is is just eye candy and you will lose FPS If I where you, I would get the idea out of my head!

Best answer dextermat Apr 24,8: I don’t suppose you’ve heard the new Call of Duty: That milk is fresh, but i want the one that smells foul and looks like cottage cheese, same logic for you nVidia loyalists. That means it will look much better on nvicia Nvidia card, and no, you won’t be able to use the CPU for PhysX at any rate other than a slideshow in that game, or on Witcher 3, or on Batman Arkham City.

Related Drivers  LG GBC-H20N DRIVER DOWNLOAD

LB23 Apr 29, If you want it to work, you have to use old drivers and old PhysX software that was released long before Borderlands 2 support was implemented. Here is a small video of it working on my system.

Im running 2 s crossfire with a GT for physx. AMD may end up buying out nVidia soon, who knows. I’m quite surprised there hasn’t been anymore development into this option, jvidia would have thought that by now someone would have made a program to force the CUDA cores to take on PhysX.

Ask a new question.

Specifications

In my opinion, while nVidia maintains this lock and key secrecy over their PhysX processing technology, the more they are hammering the nails into their own coffin. It would seem, that because nVidia decided to get secretive and prevent ANY other company from producing PhysX capable cards has ultimately back fired, nfidia this idea was a promising thought, had more game producers utilized this feature in their games i’m sure AMD would have suffered more so, however, PhysX alone will not entice game developers enough, as AMD is focusing on Tesselation, which translates roughly to “super duper sexy Eye Candy” which makes games look better and smoother.

Its so easy to do I cant see how you got it wrong unless you installed amd drivers then nvidia’s. Dont expect a big score on something like fluidmark.

Finally, your AMD “power horses” are only cheap because that’s the only way they can get someone to buy them.